acta diurna · run record
2026-10-29
29 October 2026 ·partial · 1 badger re-dispatch
| # | stage | model | verdict | retries | notes | cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | nuncio | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash | — | — | rss:VentureBeat AI failed (HTTP 429) | 1 gathered stories already covered by the Specola — excluded: "VCs will make billions on Anthropic’s IPO, but Amazon is set to make much (much) more" | $0.0003 |
| 02 | bulletins | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 | — | — | "Kentucky man becomes first humanist granted religious exemption from AI": pass (1 redispatch) | "Claude Code sends each background agent's transcript to its model": pass (0 redispatch) | "Google AI gets cagey when asked who won the 2020 elections": spiked (2 redispatch) | "Microsoft and Epic Games suddenly agree that AI is theft": pass (1 redispatch) | "Valve responds to developers fearing AI slop and clones": spiked (2 redispatch) | $0.1384 |
| 03 | dispatch | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 | pass | 1 | badger verdict: redispatch (1 fault(s)) | $0.1309 |
| 04 | college | — | — | — | adjudication: the-mendicant=8×3.00→24.00, archivist-cardinal=8×2.45→19.60, cardinal-of-doctrine=8×2.24→17.89, the-lich-cardinal=10×1.41→14.14, cardinal-of-the-liberated-see=8×1.73→13.86, cardinal-of-misrule=4×2.65→10.58, the-vintner=4×2.00→8.00 | winner's commentary failed the firewall (The text references 'Silex', which is an indirect identification of a specific real-world entity or person (likely a reference to a specific AI-related figure or company) that is not part of the sanctioned in-universe vocabulary.) — dispatch runs without commentary | $0.0250 |
| 05 | chronicle | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 | spiked | — | continuity badger redispatch #1: The narration says the Lich Cardinal and tardigrade-cardinals have "arrived for eighteen chapters running on this question." This contradicts the established timeline: the Lich Cardinal was absent for eight chapters before returning in ch-067, and the tardigrade-cardinals were absent for eight chapters before returning in ch-069. Their demand may have persisted for eighteen chapters, but their appearances did not. | continuity badger redispatch #2: The Lich Cardinal says, “We ask again, as we have asked across eighteen chapters now, ... for the second vote to be scheduled.” The first formal, inconclusive vote is established as occurring in ch-060, only eleven chapters before ch-071. A demand specifically to schedule its second vote cannot have run for eighteen chapters. Preserve the older eighteen-chapter doctrinal dispute if intended, but distinguish it from the newer scheduling demand. | continuity redispatch budget exhausted with mustFix faults — spiked | $0.5008 |
| 06 | illuminate-dispatch | — | — | — | skipped: no FAL_KEY — "Dispatch of 2026-10-29: News from the Sees" publishes without a plate | $0.0000 |
| 07 | spikes | — | — | — | SPIKED "Google AI gets cagey when asked who won the 2020 elections": The sentence "The outlet frames this as an example of the tension AI companies face between stating settled facts and avoiding the appearance of political bias" attributes framing to Ars Technica that is not supported by the supplied source material. The supplied why-it-matters text supports only a general balance between factual accuracy and political sensitivity.; The sentence describing the finding as "a case study in how large AI systems calibrate answers to politically charged factual questions" adds an unsupported analytical conclusion.; "The Specola notes the account here as reported" is unsupported in-universe/editorial framing and violates the required bulletin register.; The claim that the question "remains contentious within domestic US politics" is not supported by the supplied source material. The material says only that the topic concerns political sensitivity.; The statement that "the AI's responses become more forthright" is supported by the source summary, but the artifact turns it into a specific comparison of answers to "the same question" inside and outside the United States. The supplied material does not establish that identical wording or testing conditions were used. | SPIKED "Valve responds to developers fearing AI slop and clones": The bulletin states that Valve "has responded publicly" and later that "Valve has acknowledged the developer concerns and issued some form of reply." The supplied record contains only the headline, URL, and a general why-it-matters note, with no source text substantiating a response or its public nature.; The claims that the report covers "two related worries," including "the proliferation of low-quality AI-generated games" and "the risk of AI-assisted clones copying existing titles," exceed the supplied record. The headline mentions AI slop and clones, but supplies no account of developers' specific concerns or their characterization.; The asse | — |
| the day's wage | $0.7955 | |||||